Relationships agreements would commonly indicate the period of time when you look at the hence amarriage should have chosen to take place
step one. But really, when you look at the genealogy, all of us knowthat for each and every code there’s a difference. A beneficial vexing section ofgenealogy is the fact no-one most understands just how to make use of the fresh new conditions orrules which have any decisive adjective such as usually, perhaps, most likely,probably, etcetera. It will be fascinating if indeed there most other examples ofjointures are produced a-year or a couple shortly after a well-known relationships go out.
dos. Could there be a keen extant dispensation into the relationships out of ElizabethClifford and you will Sir Ralph Bowes have been 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or 4th cousins, immediately after taken off brand new 5th LordClifford? Who would restrict their matrimony day.
Arthur
Presumably, in the event that an excellent dispensation was wanted and you may provided, it might havebeen by among pursuing the, and might are available in the correspondingregister publication, if this survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop away from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. Should your 10th Lord Clifford does wed during the early 1487 [state January] andhas Elizabeth later where seasons, does the new chronology not performs?
John arms?
Age born within the later 1487, Henry created into the 1488/9, Joan for the ,etcetera. filling in the names of your upload out of . When the (a) thechronology still work; and you will (b) their unique matrimony piece was not lower; thenwe simply have the fresh 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s which is when you look at the oppositionto the fresh new supposition you to definitely she are a legitimate child.
6. About your 1505 pedigree: Would be the Clifford daughters this new onlyknown Henry VII connections omitted? Are there others? In this case,would not one reflect badly on this subject file because the a resource?
Off contrasting I’ve created from the latest c.1505 Henry VII Affairs pedigreeswith this new 1480-1500 Visitation of your Northern pedigrees, which happen to be
On c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, the fresh Clifford youngsters are perhaps not listedin a Clifford pedigree, but instead about St. John pedigree. Since the I’mnot always the latest St. John friends, following the ’s the advice asit appears regarding c.1505 pedigree, because the taken from the new 1834 Coll. Most readily useful. etGen. article. The fresh phrasing in quotations is precisely as it appears inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
„Zero. XII.“From my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.“f.288, 296, 317, 318.“Margaret Duchess out of Somerset got three husbands.“ Because of the „John Duke ofSomerset“ she got „My Lady the brand new King’s Mother.“ who had „The brand new King.“ whohad „Prince „Of the „Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest partner.“ she had step three daus & dos sons:
A great. „Edith, wedded to Geoffrey Pole off Buckinghamshire.“ They had:A1. „Sir Richard Rod, Knt. sexiga Franska-flickor married towards Woman Margaret, dau. out of theDuke out of Clarence.“ That they had: „Harry. „A2. „Alianor, married in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.“ They’d: „John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[yet another child, unnamed].“
B. „John Ssint John, esq.“ He previously five youngsters:B1. „Sir John Saint John, Knight.“ who’d „Five daughters and oneson.“B2. „Anne, wedd. to Harry Lord Clifford.“ They’d „Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.“B3. „E, wedded so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. from Lincolnshire.“B4. „A Nun out of Shaftesbury.“B5. „Oliver Saint John.“
C. „Dame Mary, wedded so you’re able to Sir Richard Frognall.“ They’d:C1. „Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and sistren.“ Having issueindicated, however entitled.C2. „Elizabeth, married to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.“
D. „Elizabeth, wedded basic towards Lord Zouche; shortly after towards the LordScrope off Bolton.“ Issue:D1. [by Zouche] “ Catesby.“ That they had:“E. George. John. William.“D2. [by Scrope] “ Conyers.“ Having issueindicated however called.
Margaret Duchess off Somerset, by the „Lionel Lord Welles, last spouse.“had: „John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. from K. Edward IV.“ andthey got „Elizabeth.“
